Home - List All Discussions

Abortion "Addict" Confesses 15 Abortions in 16 Years

by: 4given

From the article:
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ReproductiveHealth/abortion-addict-admits-multiple-abortions-suicide-attempts/story?id=8594347
Irene Vilar worries that her self-described "abortion addiction" will be misunderstood, twisted by the pro-life movement to deny women the right to choose.
Her book, "Impossible Motherhood," which will be released by Other Press on Oct. 6, chronicles her own dark choices: 15 abortions in 16 years, much of it as a married woman.
As press on the book has begun to leak out, Vilar -- a literary agent and editor --- says she has already sensed "an inkling of hatred."
Vilar has scheduled only closed-door interviews and will not do a book tour. At the urging of her husband, they have made sure all public property records do not reflect her name, so she cannot be targeted at their home.
"I am worried about my safety and the hate mail," she told ABCNews.com in a telephone interview as her home-schooled children were at work on a painting project.
"No book like this has ever been written," she told ABCNews.com. "I just imagine the 'baby killer' and I could be a poster child for that kind of fundamentalism. And there are my little kids in all of that."
Today, at 40, the Latina author has two young children, but her troubled past continues to haunt her well into motherhood.
Vilar attended boarding school in New Hampshire and was just 15 when she left for Syracuse University, where she fell in love and later married her first husband, a tyrannical 50-year-old professor.
With a predilection for young women, he bragged that his relationships had never lasted more than five years and that having children killed sexual desire.
She says their emotionally dependent relationship was riddled with shame, self-mutilation and several suicide attempts.

reply from: saucie

She's murdered 15 of her very own children, tells boldly of self mutilation and suicide attempts and is worried what people in the prolife movement will think....obviously she's still troubled and should be telling this to a team of mental health professionals, not trying to PROFIT off the gruesome deaths of her children.
It's stunning to see someone bordering on the criminally insane walk the streets and acutally get published.

reply from: kd78

i always thought one abortion, maybe two, was bad enough. more than that is just atrocious! 15 is inexcusable!

reply from: Shenanigans

Holy crap!
Just imagine what her kids are going to think when they're old enough to read her book, I wouldn't be surprised if it was bound in human skin.
Which then, begs the question, why the fu*k didn't she get her tubes tied, even on the sly?

reply from: saucie

There are some really sick twisted freaks running loose....this is just one example.

reply from: yoda

But what you are implying is that abortion is a "little bit wrong", so that many of them are more wrong that just one.
According to proabort theology, there is nothing wrong with ANY abortion, so there is nothing wrong with 15 of them.

reply from: Banned Member

If abortion is a right, why are 15 abortions worse than 1 abortion?
No one thinks it horrible if you excercise your right to vote 15 times, or excercise your right to free speech 15 times, or peaceable assembe 15 times, own 15 firearms, buy 15 newpapers, go to church 15 times, when he hold 15 fair trials...?
Why are 15 abortions worse than 1 abortion?

reply from: Banned Member

If abortion is a treatment and a right, should you have as many treatments as you need?
Isn't cancer treatment very dangerous itself?

reply from: lukesmom

HER BODY/HER CHOICE. Geez Spinny you are an insult to all proaborts everywhere if you don't support her choice to have as many procedures as she wants to rid herself of all those nonhuman blobs. So what if there are consequences, that is, again, HER BODY/HER CHOICE.

reply from: Banned Member

Couldn't this woman have just as easily died from a complication from the 1st abortion as the 15th?
Would spinwiddy tell a woman that she doesn't have the right to remove 15 tumors from her body? Isn't treatment a right?

reply from: lukesmom

Now you're judging her! For sure you are going to lose your proabort card and then what will you do for fun?

reply from: Banned Member

But abortion is a treatment! Abortion is health care! We can't deny women health care!!!

reply from: yoda

Then why are you criticizing her?
How is it any of your concern if she wants 15 plastic surgeries, or 15 abortions? Or 150 of each?

reply from: Banned Member

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
No, I never said that she didn't have the right.
What I said was that - just like the cosmetic surgery junkies - she was perfectly within her rights to have all of the invasive procedures she wants. I just don't understand why.
So abortion is really just cosmetic surgery?
Does that mean that nose jobs aren't really health care???

reply from: yoda

Right, it's like a face lift, only lower.

reply from: Banned Member

ABORTION=COSETIC SURGERY

reply from: Banned Member

What a woman is free to choose because it is her right she would be free to choose as often as she may wish.
...OR SINCE WHEN WAS A PERSONAL RIGHT DEFINED AS A NECESSARY EVIL?
SPINWIDDY compares abortion to drug illegal drug use. Fascinating. ABORTION JUNKIE?

reply from: lukesmom

Actually according to your proabort friends it is not your business to try to undersand why. Why don't you follow the proabort creed to "mind your own business"?

reply from: yoda

So what's wrong with that?
Why don't you just "not buy her book", instead of attacking her?

reply from: lukesmom

So what's wrong with that?
Why don't you just "not buy her book", instead of attacking her?
Because Spinny is a self proclaimed proabort and evidently it is ok for them to attack whomever, but let anyone else express an opinion then it is "judgemental" and intrusive. Spinny likes to spin it her way only.

reply from: yoda

I take a more charitable view...... I think she's just doing the job she was hired to do....... and only enjoys it just a little.

reply from: lukesmom

Another nut from the peanut gallery checks in. Actually the irony is the fact that a self proclaimed proCHOICER is attacking another prochoicer's choice to have 15 abortions. Can anyone say hypocrite? Talk about "chronic stupidity".

reply from: Banned Member

Uh, becase choosing to have 15 invasive surgical procedures instead of trying to avoid them isn't very bright.
Having an abortion isn't very bright.
It's kind of like those plastic surgery addicts.
Compares abortion to cosmetic surgery.
Having a procedure or two to correct a problem is great. Having 30 procedures due to your untreated body dysphoria is disturbing.
Abortion is the same as cosmetic surgery and therefore, it is disturbing.
(You'd think that a woman with those academic credentials would have figured out what was causing the pregnancies - at least by abortion #7 or #8.)
A women who has repeated abortions is untelligent. (So much for formal education and degrees!)
I don't know why this woman would want us to know that she keeps making the same mistake over and over again, and never gets any smarter.
Getting pregnant is a mistake if that means that you are going to have an abortion.
Spinwiddy is for a woman's right to make choices. What number of choices would that be exactly?

reply from: lukesmom

Like I said, Another nut from the peanut gallery.

reply from: Banned Member

I think that I understand Spinwiddy perfectly well. She is a Margaret Sanger mental clone who believes that abortion should be safe legal and rare so that undesirables are few, brief and unseen. A woman who has 15 abortion more perfectly demonstrate the folly of abortion than a woman who simply has one abortion. One abortion is defensible while 15 becomes problematic in terms of explainability. Spiniwddy would happier if people never heard about stories like this because like this make abortion easily condemnable. People become more sensitive to common sense when it is opposed by barbarity to the extreme measure.

reply from: Banned Member

I pray that everything about Barack Obama fails. I would rather see America fail than anything that Obama plans succeed. The man is evil.

reply from: kd78

But what you are implying is that abortion is a "little bit wrong", so that many of them are more wrong that just one.
According to proabort theology, there is nothing wrong with ANY abortion, so there is nothing wrong with 15 of them.
did you just call me a pro-abort?

reply from: yoda

Hardly. I'm saying your words may not have been chosen carefully.

reply from: ProInformed

She's murdered 15 of her very own children, tells boldly of self mutilation and suicide attempts and is worried what people in the prolife movement will think....obviously she's still troubled and should be telling this to a team of mental health professionals, not trying to PROFIT off the gruesome deaths of her children.
It's stunning to see someone bordering on the criminally insane walk the streets and acutally get published.
If she really were worried what pro-lifers thought of her, or even was supposedly so scared of pro-lifers, she wouldn't have so casually killed 15 of her babies would she?
Naw the truth is she is just feigning fear because she thinks that will somehow silence pro-lifers who would (should) be appalled by her serial fatal abuse of her babies.
She suffers under a delusion that pro-lifers should be worried about what she thinks about us - if we don't hide our revulsion regarding her repeatedly killing her babies.
Um I'm not exactly going to loose any sleep (or keep quiet) worrying what SHE thinks!!!

reply from: fetalisa

Birth control is so much cheaper, in cost AND time. Could you imagine the hassle of having to schedule so my doctor's appointments?

reply from: AbortionSupport

Addicted to murder, shouldn't this person get the death penalty? Totally sick!!

reply from: leftsfoil

Dear AbortionSupport, Kudos on your website. Can you please select a different avatar? You look just like Satan's mistress (fetalisa) and it's hard for me to look at... JUST KIDDING! Welcome to the forum.

reply from: carolemarie

Maybe she is worried about being called names because she has been on this board and seen the LOVE shown to people who had abortions here!
Does she advocate abortion? I got the impression she was not happy with her choices and the results of her abortions resulted in depression, suicide attempts and other self destructive behavior. Abortion takes a toll on those who choose it as her story points out.
I am glad she is able to be a good mother now....hopefully other women will find her tale cautionary and avoid the same situtations.

reply from: yoda

Need a crying towel? Got a tear or two for the unborn who are about to die? Or do you restrict your sympathy for those who are "called names"?

reply from: saucie

There you go again, not giving a "damn" about the children.
And got your knickers in a bunch over some "maybe" about name calling.
There is such a thing as priorities....yours are so screwed up it's enough to make one wretch.

reply from: saucie

She's murdered 15 of her very own children, tells boldly of self mutilation and suicide attempts and is worried what people in the prolife movement will think....obviously she's still troubled and should be telling this to a team of mental health professionals, not trying to PROFIT off the gruesome deaths of her children.
It's stunning to see someone bordering on the criminally insane walk the streets and acutally get published.
If she really were worried what pro-lifers thought of her, or even was supposedly so scared of pro-lifers, she wouldn't have so casually killed 15 of her babies would she?
Naw the truth is she is just feigning fear because she thinks that will somehow silence pro-lifers who would (should) be appalled by her serial fatal abuse of her babies.
She suffers under a delusion that pro-lifers should be worried about what she thinks about us - if we don't hide our revulsion regarding her repeatedly killing her babies.
Um I'm not exactly going to loose any sleep (or keep quiet) worrying what SHE thinks!!!
She's trying to deflect the rightful distain others will feel towards her onto the prolifers.
And with the likes of Carolmarie helping her, she just might succeed.
The behavior of enablers like CM is truly sickening.

reply from: carolemarie

How am I enabling her Saucie? She apparently finds her past behavior wrong and isn't for it now, do I have to hate her and call her names? Grow up!

reply from: saucie

Who said you had to hate her and call her names?
And you have the stinking nerve to tell me to grow up!
She apparently looked for a scapegoat (prolifers) while she wrote the book, so others will "HATE AND CALL PRO-LIFERS NAMES"!
That ought to make you exceedingly happy, it's what YOU do.

reply from: carolemarie

I only point out the hatred you are throwing around and calling prolife.
And the attitude on this board is hostile toward anyone who has had an abortion. Thankfully, it is only the fringe prolifers who indulge in this type of behavior.
Most of us work to treat both the women and the babies as people with dignity and worth, and we recognize that we have to be the agents of reconcillation in this war. We will win when we choose to love

reply from: yoda

NO ONE needs YOU to "point out" anything.
If you're so "full of love", the QUIT ATTACKING other prolifers and go about your business!!

reply from: saucie

Who were the "agents of reconcillation" for the Jews, or the blacks?
Did someone solve those atrocities by giving the murderers tea and chocoloate? Were they freed from their death sentences by loving their enemies???
What the hell is the matter with you...(hint: hell being the operative word.)
Just because these helpless victims can't be seen they are treated as if they don't exist...and by people like YOU.
I haven't said one thing negative about your abortions...not once, not ever.
I've supported and encouraged those who have had abortions and have repented.
You have serious problems...you're still feeding on pablum....You're the one who needs to grow up and start eating the MEAT!

reply from: carolemarie

the agents of reconcillation for the Jews were the underground railroad

reply from: bozo

Tea and chocolate?
Explain please.
No, but what would have been the harm in doing as Jesus would have had them do?
Is there a downside to loving and forgiving your enemies?

reply from: saucie

Tea and chocolate?
Explain please.
No, but what would have been the harm in doing as Jesus would have had them do?
Is there a downside to loving and forgiving your enemies?
What would be the harm?????????
They would still be slaves and the Jews would have been wiped off the face of the earth!
Are you really that ignorant???
And you better figure out exactly what Jesus meant by "YOUR" enemies.
"My people perish for the lack of knowlege"....get some. That's the best advice you'll get.

reply from: saucie

Are you really that stupid?
Am I suppose to laugh?

reply from: carolemarie

I just don't see the two things as the same. (abortion and the houlocaust or slavery)
so the comparisons don't work, for one thing, the jews and slaves were born people who you could see. There were other ways to save them without killing. Corrie Ten Boom was an example of an agent of reconcillation.
agents of reconcilliation are those of us who live in peace and work to provide justice and grace to all.
Abortion is a terrible wrong. We have to work to end it, and we have to reach people one heart at a time, it isn't enough to love the babies, you have to love the mothers and doctors as well. That is our challenge. To love others has Christ as loved us.

reply from: yoda

Are you really that stupid?
Am I suppose to laugh?
Goodness, think about all those mistaken history books that say the underground railroad was the path taken by runaway slaves going north.... we'll have to change them all!!

reply from: yoda

So, if I murder someone in private, where no one can see them (not even me), than that is not "the same as" murdering someone out in the open?
Privacy makes murder less evil? Evil that is hidden isn't as bad as evil that is out in the open?
Is that really how you see things?

reply from: yoda

No thanks, spitwad. She didn't write "Jewish Underground Railroad", did she?
You google it yourself, and tell us what you find.
#Underground Railroad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Underground Railroad was an informal network of secret routes and safe houses used by 19th century Black slaves in the United States to escape to free states and Canada with the aid...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underground_Railroad - 156k - Cached

reply from: carolemarie

I expected you all to know that there were groups of people who helped Jews escape (underground railroad) I wasn't aware that everything had to be spelled out to you,there were many groups that helped smuggle jews out of harms way.
And the BIG difference in abortion and the other two things is that the baby and the mother are a single unit. You can't save the baby without the mother. You could rescue a Jew from a Nazi, as they are two different people. You could help a slave escape the plantation, you can't help a fetus escape its mother.
They are very very different things.

reply from: bozo

Tea and chocolate?
Explain please.
No, but what would have been the harm in doing as Jesus would have had them do?
Is there a downside to loving and forgiving your enemies?
What would be the harm?????????
They would still be slaves and the Jews would have been wiped off the face of the earth!
Are you really that ignorant???
And you better figure out exactly what Jesus meant by "YOUR" enemies.
"My people perish for the lack of knowlege"....get some. That's the best advice you'll get.
Tell me why I should not love "my enemies" and why the Nazis are not my enemies. Am I supposed to hate them? Am I supposed to hope they go to hell or should I pray for their conversion?
Share the knowledge if you have it and if you are concerned about me perishing because I lack it.
Now what about my question about "tea and chocolates"?
Nevermind...but I will inform you of something, lest you perish in your ignornance.
Telling a "half-truth" is the same as telling a lie.
Taking one thing out of a greater context with the intent to smear someone's character or the intent to cause a distorted picture of what that person does is deceitful and evil.
You only get one beep for that...
BEEP

reply from: yoda

The phrase "underground railroad" has a specific meaning IN THIS COUNTRY that is associated with BLACK SLAVES.... NOT JEWS!! It's not my fault that you are ignorant of American history!
You talk just like a proabort. They are NOT a "single unit", they are TWO INDIVIDUALS!!
And EVEN IF we accepted your "single unit" theory, how would that make it MORALLY different things?????
KILLING THE INNOCENT IS KILLING THE INNOCENT!!

reply from: saucie

The phrase "underground railroad" has a specific meaning IN THIS COUNTRY that is associated with BLACK SLAVES.... NOT JEWS!! It's not my fault that you are ignorant of American history!
You talk just like a proabort. They are NOT a "single unit", they are TWO INDIVIDUALS!!
And EVEN IF we accepted your "single unit" theory, how would that make it MORALLY different things?????
KILLING THE INNOCENT IS KILLING THE INNOCENT!!
You've wasted nothing by trying to reason with this horribly inept woman.
It's good that others can see how wrong she is in her thinking and priorities.
Thanks for taking the time, Yoda. I don't think I could have stood reading her posts and trying to show her how terribly wrong she is....
I'm glad you were feeling up to it!

reply from: carolemarie

It isn't the same thing at all Yoda. And you know that! The baby is inside the mother, or rather the baby is inside the person who wants to eliminate it. You can't stop the eliminatioin of the baby unless you change the mind of the woman.
With slavery, you could simply help the slave escape and never have to deal with the planation owner. Or you could smuggle a Jew out of the country and never deal with the Nazi who was hunting them...
it makes a big difference in talking about the two things.....that difference....the location of the victim, which is inside the oppressor changes the whole ballgame. You can't simply shoot the woman and save the baby,

reply from: saucie

What on earth is that suppose to mean??? Are you that thick?
The person is ALWAYS a woman and she's ALWAYS the mother.

reply from: carolemarie

the mother may not want the abortion, she could be being forced which is why I typed it that way

reply from: saucie

It still doesn't make her NOT the mother....wow....even you have to understand that much.

reply from: carolemarie

and then you should have understood the point that they are not two separate people, like the slaves and slave owners were.

reply from: saucie

Good grief....that doesn't make them the same person either.
You really are thick.
The baby has complete different DNA than the mother...they are TWO speperate people.
Wow...you'll reach down to find any old dirty excuse for abortion. Stunning.

reply from: carolemarie

try reading!
this was about why I see the comparision between slavery and abortion to be not factual.
the baby and mom are one unit. You can't save baby without changing moms mind.
Slavery you can save slave without changing the slave owner.
The comparison breaks down because of this great difference

reply from: yoda

No wonder we go around and around....... you throw out phrases that have no meaning at all......... like, what is "IT"? and what is "the same thing"?
When you are ready to try to speak in specific terms about whatever it is that you're trying to say, I'll be all ears.....

reply from: yoda

The physical dependency of the baby does NOT make it a part of the woman's body. They are NOT "one unit".
Have your proabort friends brainwashed you totally?

reply from: carolemarie

are you being delibertly obtuse? You know exactly what I am saying.
Since the baby is inside the woman, you cant save the baby without dealing with the mother.
Not so in the other two comparisons.

reply from: yoda

That's TOTALLY DIFFERENT from saying "It's not the same thing".
You're speaking of a physical difference in the situation, NOT a MORAL difference!!
Can you really not see the distinction between physical and moral?

reply from: leftsfoil

I just read the last three pages and now I feel a little queezy and my head hurts. Son-of-a-bucket.

reply from: saucie

No seriously....you crack me up!
Oh yeah...some of these posters will cause a serious case of ^^^^
But don't even think about leaving...I mean it mister!!

reply from: fetalisa

Don't worry. We are well aware the prolife won't stop until women who have abortions are burned at the stake, just like the 'good old days.' That's precisely why our society does not listen to you blood thirsty nutjobs.

reply from: ProInformed

Don't worry. We are well aware the prolife won't stop until women who have abortions are burned at the stake, just like the 'good old days.' That's precisely why our society does not listen to you blood thirsty nutjobs.
Um never mind the fact that non-sociopaths still outnumber sicko sociopaths like you fetalisa. You're the one obsessively defending the human sacrifice of innocent human babies - not because of some myth about the sun maybe not rising if you dont keep killing - but because of your perverted worship of 'free sex'.
MOST people in no way share YOUR sicko pov fetalisa - MOST people accurately acknowledge that serial aborters are indeed sociopathic.
Oh BTW, fetalisa you've just provided more evidence for the lunatic fringe thread - evidence that you choicist fanatics are insanely devoted to the killing of innocent human babies.

reply from: ProInformed

Um when we choose to love sociopathic killers of innocent human babies?!?
You insist on stubbornly pretending there is absolutely no difference between the women who are coerced or conned into aborting, by lies, threats, and pressure... and the women who casually and repeatedly abort because they make an informed choice to live a promiscuous lifestyle. THAT is a heinously offenseive attitude YOU have towards a lot of post-aborted women - the ones who never would have aborted if they had been told the truth. Lumping ALL post-abortive women in with the prostitutes and serial aborters is NOT treating women with "dignity"!

reply from: ProInformed

How much you wanna bet that geezer perv prof paraded himself as 'pro-choice/pro-woman'?
"having children killed sexual desire"?
So it's OK to kill children if it increases sexual desire, eh?

reply from: fetalisa

How does killing non-sentient, non-conscious, non-persons, whether they be heads of cabbages of ZEFs, constitute 'sociopaths?'
Just because you are too ignorant to distinguish the difference between infanticide and abortion does not mean the rest of our society is as well.
Just because you have been brainwashed to believe sex is some vile, evil, horrible, nasty thing, does not mean the rest of our society has been as well.
You are the sicko who believes sex is some horrible, vile thing, not I.
How is it sociopathic to kill non-sentient, non-conscious, non-persons, whether they be heads of cabbages or ZEFs? At most, I could claim this woman was financially ignorant, since paying for birth control is so much cheaper than paying for numerous abortions. At the same time, I must admit that ALL in our society have the right to be financially ignorant.
Your inability to distinguish between infanticide and abortion merely reveals your own ignorance and makes no statement about me whatsoever.

reply from: fetalisa

You certainly do appear to be jealous of those who have and enjoy sex. Why is that?
As if you possess any 'truths' about abortion, when you can't even distinguish the differences between infanticide and abortion and you can't even distinguish the differences between a baby and a ZEF.
Yet demonizing women who actually have and enjoy sex is somehow treating women with 'dignity' in the delusional world in which you live.

reply from: fetalisa

Oh ok, ZEFs are 'children' simply because you say so. I suppose drinking coffee and sodas is also a sin, simply because the mormons say so. (***rolls eyes***)

reply from: carolemarie

Um when we choose to love sociopathic killers of innocent human babies?!?
You insist on stubbornly pretending there is absolutely no difference between the women who are coerced or conned into aborting, by lies, threats, and pressure... and the women who casually and repeatedly abort because they make an informed choice to live a promiscuous lifestyle. THAT is a heinously offenseive attitude YOU have towards a lot of post-aborted women - the ones who never would have aborted if they had been told the truth. Lumping ALL post-abortive women in with the prostitutes and serial aborters is NOT treating women with "dignity"!
I never said there was no difference if you are forced into an abortion! I just don't think that means you have the right to slam other women who aborted for other reasons.

And since you were unmarried when you became pregnant, you were living a promiscuous lifestyle as well. So who are you to judge their morality? Your in the same boat as they are......

reply from: saucie

Um when we choose to love sociopathic killers of innocent human babies?!?
You insist on stubbornly pretending there is absolutely no difference between the women who are coerced or conned into aborting, by lies, threats, and pressure... and the women who casually and repeatedly abort because they make an informed choice to live a promiscuous lifestyle. THAT is a heinously offenseive attitude YOU have towards a lot of post-aborted women - the ones who never would have aborted if they had been told the truth. Lumping ALL post-abortive women in with the prostitutes and serial aborters is NOT treating women with "dignity"!
I never said there was no difference if you are forced into an abortion! I just don't think that means you have the right to slam other women who aborted for other reasons.

And since you were unmarried when you became pregnant, you were living a promiscuous lifestyle as well. So who are you to judge their morality? Your in the same boat as they are......
If she repented she got out of that boat, or don't you even believe in redemption?

reply from: carolemarie

Read her post, I was responding to her statement. Of course I believe in redemption, but I don't think any abortion is moral, not even hers

reply from: fetalisa

It's sad world we live in when people think they have to 'repent' for something as benign as having sex. Hell, we ALL need to be having as much sex as we possibly can, http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/features/10-surprising-health-benefits-of-sex I just feel so sorry for you people for believing you must beat yourself up for enjoying the simplest and most beneficial pleasures of life.

reply from: carolemarie

Why? Don't they have the right to choose what they believe? If they choose to believe that sex outside of marriage is immoral why would that bother you?
Do you think the only choice that is acceptable is one YOU would make? Why can't we make choices we want!

reply from: fetalisa

They most certainly do.
Because such a rule made sense when the average age of death was 30 and kids were married off at puberty, but that has not been the case in centuries.
Oh you most certainly have the right to live in the most miserable way possible, based on an ancient magical story book of talking animals.
You can and do. I have an equal right to feel sad that you place far more importance on sex that it could possibly deserve, because it only serves to rob you of enjoying life far more than you presently are. But in the end I say, suit yourself.


2017 ~ LifeDiscussions.org ~ Discussions on Life, Abortion, and the Surrounding Politics