Home - List All Discussions

Still waiting for Cecilia to answer.....

"Hope springs eternal".....

by: yoda

Is the elective taking of innocent human life an act of control, Cecilia?

reply from: 4choice4all

Cecilia..I don't know you very well yet....but please don't answer. This is too much fun...like watching a dog chase it's tail. Pretty please? with sugar on top? Leave him hanging!

reply from: nancyu

WHAT an idiot. Yuuki, watch out. You've got someone trying to out-do your dumbness.

reply from: yoda

Originally posted by: 4choice4all
Cecilia..I don't know you very well yet....but please don't answer./q]
I'd be really happy to see your answer!
How would YOU answer that question?

reply from: Shenanigans

I'd be really happy to see your answer!
How would YOU answer that question?
I think its funny that she answered it. Or at least made a comment in the thread.

reply from: faithman

That would be quite a feat indeed.

reply from: Yuuki

Considering my high level of intelligence it's not hard to outdo me in stupidity. In fact, most of the nation is stupider than I am.

reply from: scopia19822

"Considering my high level of intelligence it's not hard to outdo me in stupidity. In fact, most of the nation is stupider than I am."
What is your IQ? Have you ever been diagnosed with a Narcassitic personality? There is nothing wrong with being proud of ones accomplishments and education especially if one has worked hard, but to say that most of the nation is stupider than you is outright arrogant.

reply from: galen

__________________
yep this one is definately one of fara's alters...

reply from: scopia19822

"yep this one is definately one of fara's alters..."
I dont have multiple personalites but when I was little I had an imaginary friend named Sam and no he was not the neighbors talk.

reply from: faithman

Considering my high level of intelligence it's not hard to outdo me in stupidity. In fact, most of the nation is stupider than I am.
What do ya know? An educated fool.

reply from: iCelebr8Life

I do notice quite a bit of sarcasm, mean-spiritedness, incivility and churlish writings on this forum. Does this reflect the innate personalities of people or does the subject matter invite this behavior as a stress-relieving response?

reply from: faithman

UUUUHHHHH? All the above? But you can always leave the same way you came if you don't like it.... Just a thought...

reply from: ProInformed

I'd be really happy to see your answer!
How would YOU answer that question?
I think its funny that she answered it. Or at least made a comment in the thread.
Yea yet another Roe-Bimbot here to chant choicist myths while being oh so careful to NOT learn anything and to NOT answer questions.
Sheesh choicist sheeple sound more like Stepford wives than thinking, courageous feminist to me.
So they come to online forums because they think it's fun to not answer any questions, eh? They're just here for some trolling fun, eh?
Never mind that thousands of innocent babies will be butchered again today, just like yesterday and the day before that.. for over three decades, PLUS some women have been killed by so-called 'safe' abortions too... Never mind that child molesters know they can count on the abortion clinics to hide their crimes when they bring their underage female victims in for abortions...
whoopee - the chanting choicists are just here for the fun, eh?
And why IS the 'new' choicist POSEter (recycled troll with a new posting name)
begging cecelia not to answer, hmmm?
Could it be because she doesn't like it being discussed that when females kill their own babies it IS because of a decidedly non-maternal, cruel, insanely selfish, unnaturally excessive desire to CONTROL?
And how immensely cowardly is it for choicists to come to an abortion discussion forum, then ignoring questions to be answered so that their POV is not examined, by others or themselves.
It must be scary to realize their choicist POV is so ill-informed and shoddy that it can't stand up to questioning, eh?

reply from: Faramir

__________________
yep this one is definately one of fara's alters...
Who is "fara"?

reply from: ProInformed

Here's an article about 'people' who have a violent need to CONTROL:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/Story?id=522184&page=1

reply from: 4choice4all

Could you point me to the original post in which the question was asked? Out of context, I hate to answer it.
I'm not Fara(mir's) alter ego but I certainly don't mind being compared to one of the few people on here with thought out responses and integrity.

reply from: faithman

All who thing 4choice is a snooty little death scanc, raise your http://www.armyofgod.com/Baby12.html [click blue hands for results.]

reply from: iCelebr8Life

UUUUHHHHH? All the above? But you can always leave the same way you came if you don't like it.... Just a thought...
Thank you faithman for your response.I do find this board an interesting and challenging place for me to exercise civility and kindness. Although I fall short of my ambitions, I am ever striving to do unto others as I would have them do unto me.

reply from: faithman

UUUUHHHHH? All the above? But you can always leave the same way you came if you don't like it.... Just a thought...
Thank you faithman for your response.I do find this board an interesting and challenging place for me to exercise civility and kindness. Although I fall short of my ambitions, I am ever striving to do unto others as I would have them do unto me.
Speaking of doing unto others, What if someone was doing http:// http://www.armyofgod.com/Baby10.html to you or someone you loved? Would you want some one to stop it? In your poly Anna world, what is the proper responce to evil aggression?

reply from: yoda

I don't read all the threads every day, as you may have noticed. The only thing I've seen from her directly was a link to a post where she "explained" why she wasn't going to answer it. I don't consider that an "answer".

reply from: yoda

You may have something there, Mary. He's been know to do that.

reply from: yoda

Look, Faramir is already the "unofficial attitude patrol" on the forum. You'll have to wait until he's through whining if you want to take his job.

reply from: yoda

I really do think so. I think that the elective slaughter of the innocent is something that is done by the ULTIMATE CONTROL FREAK.....

reply from: Yuuki

Considering my high level of intelligence it's not hard to outdo me in stupidity. In fact, most of the nation is stupider than I am.
What do ya know? An educated fool.
What do you know? A human.

reply from: Faramir

You may have something there, Mary. He's been know to do that.
If you mean me, I've been "known" to be carolmarie and churchmouse too...
If I'm posing as the new "deathscort" I think I deserve credit for doing such an awesome and convincing job.
lol
Suspicion and paranoia run deep here. I didn't suspect that of galen. She's just selectively nasty, but I didn't think she was another tin foil hat type.

reply from: yoda

It's in my sig. Can you not see our sigs?

reply from: yoda

You're gaining quite a "fan club" here, fara.......

reply from: yoda

Haven't you heard? The proper, loving way to stop serial killers is to offer them a jar of honey. Stops them dead in their tracks, every time.

reply from: Yuuki

Nope, I have no mental disorders at all thanks. I am rather proud to be completely sane. And if you've never taken a standardized test then you really have no idea what I'm talking about. They test all students in a certain grade across the entire nation. Most people fall into the 50th percentile, which means average. Higher means you answered more questions right. I was always in the 99th percentile. It's not an opinion, which is the basis of narcissism. It is a fact.

reply from: faithman

Haven't you heard? The proper, loving way to stop serial killers is to offer them a jar of honey. Stops them dead in their tracks, every time.
I guess we need to re-equip every S.W.A.T. team in america then, don't we?

reply from: Faramir

Haven't you heard? The proper, loving way to stop serial killers is to offer them a jar of honey. Stops them dead in their tracks, every time.
I guess we need to re-equip every S.W.A.T. team in america then, don't we?
If you want to use those tactics, you would have to pick off the women as they enter the clinic.

reply from: Faramir

Haven't you heard? The proper, loving way to stop serial killers is to offer them a jar of honey. Stops them dead in their tracks, every time.
When I see evidence that calling prochoice people vile names actually saves some babies, I'll happily do it myself.
My gut feeling is that it's counterproductive, and that people like Fr. Pavone are on the right track, as per my signature.
I think the best course is to love the sinner and the misguided, but hate the thing they do or support.

reply from: yoda

Without getting into the actual point of disagreement here, I would like to point out that for something to be both a fact and an opinion is not necessarily a contradiction. Everything we believe is an opinion, some of them are true, and some are not.

reply from: Yuuki

Now I know how the hippies felt in the 60's and 70's. Which only makes me more resolute in my position.

reply from: yoda

Yep, and we'd better get started right away. I just read where Hitler actually stopped WW2 when a young German boy offered him some honey. He took it, surrendered to the allies, and then committed suicide by eating it all at once.

reply from: yoda

"Vile names"? You mean like "baby killer"? Is that a "vile name"? Or is that just an accurate description of what they do?
How about a member of the KKK? Would it be improper to call that person a racist? Is "racist" a vile name too?
How much honey would we have to give a racist to get them to stop being racist?

reply from: faithman

Haven't you heard? The proper, loving way to stop serial killers is to offer them a jar of honey. Stops them dead in their tracks, every time.
When I see evidence that calling prochoice people vile names actually saves some babies, I'll happily do it myself.
My gut feeling is that it's counterproductive, and that people like Fr. Pavone are on the right track, as per my signature.
I think the best course is to love the sinner and the misguided, but hate the thing they do or support.
Pavone is a sell out judas, and one of the most false voices around. I don't care how many collars he wears backwards, or how many alterboy bender clubs he belongs to.

reply from: 4choice4all

I asked for the original thread. That one line doesn't explain the question. I promise that if you take the time to find it I will take the time to respond.

reply from: Faramir

Haven't you heard? The proper, loving way to stop serial killers is to offer them a jar of honey. Stops them dead in their tracks, every time.
When I see evidence that calling prochoice people vile names actually saves some babies, I'll happily do it myself.
My gut feeling is that it's counterproductive, and that people like Fr. Pavone are on the right track, as per my signature.
I think the best course is to love the sinner and the misguided, but hate the thing they do or support.
Pavone is a sell out judas, and one of the most false voices around. I don't care how many collars he wears backwards, or how many alterboy bender clubs he belongs to.
You think being an anti-Catholic bigot serves the unborn well?

reply from: yoda

Why don't you ask your tight buddy spinny?

reply from: yoda

I have no idea what "original thread" you're talking about. The question in my sig is self explanatory.
What don't you understand about it?

reply from: 4choice4all

Ok...well...just off that question I would say maybe, lol. Um...I think an abortion is an act of desperation. I think an abortion is an act of self preservation. I guess it a way it could be an act of controlling your life and making choices that effect your future...so yeah, maybe is my answer. Just another time when I don't see things as black and white.

reply from: Shenanigans

Considering my high level of intelligence it's not hard to outdo me in stupidity. In fact, most of the nation is stupider than I am.
My list of top five "biggest dumbarses I've ever met" has three people on who claim to be geniuses.
I feel embarrassed to be in the stasticial grouping as those morons. My IQ puts me in the top 5%, of course, the dyslexica makes it next to useless in the real world.
But I'd say you're not an idiot, you're not dumb enough to make to my list, sorry.

reply from: Cecilia

I'm flattered-i am not here for a day and now have a whole thread with my name.
4choice4all, the original thread was about yukki discussing her being a teacher. she has to watch activities she does outside of work and there was a comment made about wanting to not be controlled on free time. yoda agreed, and i quoted him, which i found 'ironic' considering that he would like to control all pregnancies which take place during someones free time at minimum not to mention inside their bodies. yoda is an 'unhealthy' man who photographs women going into clinics and posts them online. i do not find it a good 'investment' of my time to discussions which are "perpendicular" (i had to look what i meant up and translate it sorry if it is odd) to the original statement. his satement and his question which is leading are not related and i am not 'going to go down that road' because it leads to nowhere.

reply from: nancyu

What a load of crap..

reply from: Yuuki

Don't you think a lot of people murder one another as acts of desperation, and extreme emotion? We should not allow abortion just because women are scared of being pregnant and everything that comes with it - negative and/or positive. What we should do, instead of giving women the wrong way out, is to give them HELP. They think abortion is a solution to their desperation and it's not the best choice at all. Abortion is hiding the problem. That's not the best way to handle fear or problems or mistakes. The best way to handle them is head on! Step up!

reply from: yoda

Okay, so far so good. You have sidestepped the intent of the question. No surprise there.
Now, is abortion an act of controlling the LIFE of the unborn?

reply from: yoda

Well, it would lead to an answer to the question. And THAT is the place YOU do not want to go, isn't it?
Can't say I really blame you, though. How on earth can you promote the unrestricted slaughter of over a million healthy, innocent babies every year in this country if you admit that killing those babies is an act of control over them?
It just kind of kills your whole "abortion isn't really so bad" argument, doesn't it?

reply from: yoda

Is this the "answer" you were referring to, Shenanigans?

reply from: 4choice4all

Rawr!
I didn't side step...I was honest. You just don't like it because you can't think of a better response. Guess the rtl agenda didn't get their talking points to you in time?
Yukki...I've said that when we get to the point of most elective abortions..it's a total failure. We should have more ways to make abortions rare and unnecessary.

reply from: Yuuki

I don't consider a child's life to be a failure. And an abortion is not a "delete" button or a "backspace" button.

reply from: Faramir

Why don't you ask your tight buddy spinny?
How do you know she's tight?
Sounds like you know more about my buddy than I do...

reply from: yoda

Yes, you did are you are doing it again. You will not respond to the question as asked, because you do not want to discuss abortion, even here on an abortion forum. Like all proaborts, you want to keep abortion out of the discussion. Nothing new there, just another proabort distracting and diverting the discussion.
No, there's no need for that. Abortion is never "necessary" to begin with.

reply from: yoda

I'm glad you acknowledge who your friends are here, fara.

reply from: 4choice4all

No...you just don't like my answers....feel free to discuss what I said and ask more questions of me.
And abortions are very necessary in the eyes of the woman obtaining one. Your cause would be better served if you acknowledged that.

reply from: scopia19822

"And abortions are very necessary in the eyes of the woman obtaining one. Your cause would be better served if you acknowledged that."
Unless there is a tubal pregnancy or the child has died inutero there is no need for an abortion, no medical need whatsoever.

reply from: yoda

That's irrelevant. You haven't answered the question in the way it was asked, and you knew that when you responded with your dodge.
Here, I'll modify it so even you cannot twist it's meaning:
"Is the act of elective abortion an act of control over an unborn human being"?
No more twisting, dodging, or faking. A simple yes or do will do, explanations are optional.

reply from: scopia19822

That's irrelevant. You haven't answered the question in the way it was asked, and you knew that when you responded with your dodge.
Here, I'll modify it so even you cannot twist it's meaning:
"Is the act of elective abortion an act of control over an unborn human being"?
No more twisting, dodging, or faking. A simple yes or do will do, explanations are optional.
Yoda you made it too simple for them....there brains are going to turn to mush!!

reply from: 4choice4all

Actually, thank you Yoda for acknowledging that the original question was poorly worded.
So to anwer the modified question.....Elective abortion does control the fetus. Elective abortion is an act of control over the woman's body which by extension controls the life of the fetus.

reply from: yoda

And you're fine with that, right?
"Control" to the extent that it causes the death of the "fetus/child/baby"?
You see no problems with that deadly kind of control, right?

reply from: yoda

I'm too late. That's already happened.

reply from: 4choice4all

Yes. And I'm ok with women making decisions about how they give birth even though that effects the fetus. And I'm ok with women making decisions about their pregnancy in general...even though by extension, it controls the fetus's environment. Sure...I'm all for a woman excercising control over her body.

reply from: yoda

And you're "all for" a healthy woman fatally controlling her healthy baby's life, right?
That kind of "control" is okey-dokie with you, right?
Killing really doesn't bother you, as long as it's not you or anyone you care about being killed, right?

reply from: 4choice4all

Yes to the first
Yes to the second
No to the third. When it's a born person being killed, I'm concerned.

reply from: Cecilia

That's irrelevant. You haven't answered the question in the way it was asked, and you knew that when you responded with your dodge.
Here, I'll modify it so even you cannot twist it's meaning:
"Is the act of elective abortion an act of control over an unborn human being"?
No more twisting, dodging, or faking. A simple yes or do will do, explanations are optional.
now you are finally asking question that makes sense so I will answer.
you are controlling it's birth. and since it is inside my body, i get to do exactly that. why give fetus (or you for that decision) the 'right' to control my "free time"? I can not express well enough how scary and terrifying it is as a concept to me to be forced to have a child against my decision. do you understand that alot of the prochoicer come from position of fear? what do you think of that?
Yoda you want to tell me I can't control it's birth because then i would be'controlling' a human being, but it is...apples to oranges.
i think a fetus should be able to control whatever is inside of it. now that is apples to apples.
is the act of outlawing abortion an act of control over women? now think about all the very substantial 'controlling' you want to do to thousand of women! very grave, and very serious. You do not strike me as individual who should be entrusted with such a decision for anyone.
i really think you have very serious anger issue. your knoxville site and extreme activites is indicative of that. i remember you had some kind of history with abortion personally. it does not seem like you have healed from this, and if the site is not helping, and your involvment in this forum is not helping, it is time to find a different route.
best wish to you, Yoda, and i mean it. get some help!

reply from: yoda

You're not down with "The One's" stance on infanticide?
I'm shocked!

reply from: yoda

You're still dodging the issue. You're controlling it's VERY LIFE, and that's much more important than it's "birth". It's "birth" is merely the removal of the baby from the womb.
An abortion controls the very life of the unborn by TAKING IT AWAY. That is THE ultimate act of control, to take someone's very life. That you will not acknowledge that is very telling. You still skirt around the fact of the death caused by abortion, as if it meant nothing.
The elective taking of innocent life IS the ULTIMATE ACT OF CONTROL. It makes a "control freak" of every woman who has one.
What you will not acknowledge is that a pregnant woman ALREADY HAS a child...... abortion does NOT change that! Abortion simply KILLS the child she already HAS!
Maybe it's time for you to find a different route, one that does not involve killing babies, or encouraging others to do so?
I would rather BE help that get it. What about you?

reply from: nancyu

Now they make a birth control pill that eliminates monthly periods. No kidding. I saw the commercial for it yesterday. Now women aren't forced to have an unpleasant monthly period. Isn't that great that a woman can have such "control over her own body"!
They should make a pill that makes it unnecessary to have a bowel movement after eating. It's frightening to me that I am forced to have a bowel movement every day!
Just because I'm eating doesn't mean I am consenting to having a bowel movement. I insist on being able to "control my own body"!
Sorry, this isn't right. This is going against nature, and so is abortion. Even if there were not a baby involved it would still be wrong. The fact that a child is involved just makes it more gravely wrong.

reply from: ProInformed

Yea, those trusting enough to be part of the no-more-periods experiment are risking their health... after they've allowed themselves to be the guinea pigs for the latest trend for a few years or so, then we'll start hearing about the complications. Of course those selling the garbage will go on pretending it's 'safe' another decade or so and the biased old media will help them cover up... but eventually the pretense that it's 'safe' to use drugs, devices and surgeries to alter normal, healthy feminine biology is dangerous.
Who knows maybe someday it will even be acknowledged that trying to control, or destroy, feminine biology is not 'feminist'?
The pro-aborts seem to think that problems can bve 'solved' by destroying or modifying those with the problem... abused chidlren? kill more babies before birth because they might end up being abused; women weren't designed to be used as sex objects by males who don't love them or their babies? attack female biology, control it, modify it, nullify it, as if THAT were the real problem.
The 'compassion' and 'feminism' of the cruel and bimbonic overlooks the perpetrators - and instead seeks to reduce problems by fatal pre-emptive strikes against possible victims, and modifying females - SO THAT the perpetrators will not have to be challenged to change THEIR behavior, eh?
The same sort of 'thinking' would 'solve' problems like racism by aborting black babies, would 'solve' the problem of overpopulation by coerced abortions, would 'solve' the problem of underage girls being sexually molested by adult males by letting those males take them to clinics for abortions and birth control drugs and devices... oh yea, they're already 'solving' those prolems that way, aren't they?
Sick, selfish, sociopathic? Yes
'Compassionate' and 'feminist'? NOPE!

reply from: scopia19822

I take the Pill and skip the montlhy placebos because if I do not I literally damn near hemmorage. If I do not take the Pill I can bleed anywhere from 3 weeks to 3 months. For me being able to suppress them is a blessing.

reply from: 4choice4all

Does that apply to any modern medicine if it prevents a natural act? Are you opposed to csections? drugs during childbirth? formula for infants? I have a friend that has debilitating cycles like Scopia. Suppressing her periods was the last step before hysterectomy.

reply from: Cecilia

You're still dodging the issue. You're controlling it's VERY LIFE, and that's much more important than it's "birth". It's "birth" is merely the removal of the baby from the womb.
i didn't dodge i just did not say it like that. but yes, you are controlling it's life and birth. i am fine with that.
i think a fetus can control anything inside of it.
well, it does mean nothing. nothing to me what someone else does in case of abortion.
it makes her want to not have a child.
What you will not acknowledge is that a pregnant woman ALREADY HAS a child...... abortion does NOT change that! Abortion simply KILLS the child she already HAS!
this is your favorite little semantic issue of nonimportance to parrot, isn't it? you know exactly what i am saying.
Maybe it's time for you to find a different route, one that does not involve killing babies, or encouraging others to do so?
I would rather BE help that get it. What about you?
you would rather "help" women who don't want it. your idea of help is terrifying. what do you think about that? you didn't answer.

reply from: Cecilia

i just don't understand where you are coming from. women should suffer because it is natural? because not having period is means you are less feminine?
i hope you never get a disease so you won't be 'forced' to suffer from cancer or arthritus naturally, right?
you say 'unpleansant' but i say 'endometrial ablation'.

reply from: yoda

How about the word "death"? Are you "fine" with causing it's death too?
Then the slaughter of millions of innocent human beings in other acts of genocide also means "nothing" to you as well, right?
Pregnant women already have a child, and your solution is for them to kill that child. Do you deny that?
And you know exactly what I am saying, and you know that it is TRUE, don't you?
You DO KNOW that every pregnant woman ALREADY HAS A CHILD, don't you?
I think the same thing that I would about child molesters not wanting "help". I think the same as I would think about a serial killer not wanting "help". I would tell them that I'm trying to help their VICTIMS.
I place my top priority on helping the VICTIMS of senseless violence, NOT on the perpetrators of that violence.

reply from: Cecilia

How about the word "death"? Are you "fine" with causing it's death too?
i am fine with death, birth, life. you are ridiculously petty about wording.
Then the slaughter of millions of innocent human beings in other acts of genocide also means "nothing" to you as well, right?
if you had a fetus in your womb it would be unimportant to me what you did with it.
i don't see abortion as genocide so your question is...like a 'strawman' or whatever that term is when you make assumptoin and then argue off that.
Pregnant women already have a child, and your solution is for them to kill that child. Do you deny that?
my solution is for them to decide what to do with it, your "solution" is for you to decide for them.
what is your solution to unwanted pregnancy? forcing them to term? and you speak of 'control freak'...you want this for women who have no relation with you.
you are wrong and that is all there is to it.
And you know exactly what I am saying, and you know that it is TRUE, don't you?
You DO KNOW that every pregnant woman ALREADY HAS A CHILD, don't you?
i just dont care. why are you so obsessed with it?
I think the same thing that I would about child molesters not wanting "help". I think the same as I would think about a serial killer not wanting "help". I would tell them that I'm trying to help their VICTIMS.
I place my top priority on helping the VICTIMS of senseless violence, NOT on the perpetrators of that violence.
pregnant women are not serial killers or child molestors. These women don't need your brand of "help".
you have skated past asnwering the question about how your views are literally terrifying to me and other women. Terrifying, scary, very fear based. the prochoicers i think come from this feeling of fear. why don't you have anything to say about that?
i think you need help. seriousness, you stalk women and take their pictures. dont you have a job? why dont you raise money fo ryour local pregnancy crisis center or donate your time to babysit (not that I think you should be around children).
i can't believe i am talking to a man like you.
i'm finished; you are a "hot mess".

reply from: Yuuki

Well obviously in your case your period does not act the way it's supposed to, and there's nothing wrong with intervening with that.
Also, I realise that mathematically, the 10% increase I read about is not the huge thing I thought it was. Let's say my risk of cervical cancer is 5% - no family history, no smoking, so my risk is pretty low already. A 10% increase means we find what 10% of 5 is. It happens to be .5 btw. That means my risk increased to a whopping 5.5%. That's a lot different than an increase to say, 15% which is how I'd originally misinterpreted the data.
Ya gotta be careful with these kinds of things!

reply from: Yuuki

Well it just goes to show that if you're not careful when you're reading, even someone smart can misinterpret something. I'm just glad I didn't make a bigger deal out of it than I did.

reply from: yoda

Words have meaning, Cecilia, so they are important. For example, you saying that you're fine with controlling the life and death of the unborn shows how little you care about innocent human life. And that's relevant in the abortion debate.
I know, you don't even see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being to begin with, do you?
Yes, your solution is the same as telling Andrea Yates to decide what to do with HER children. Mine is to tell her she is not allowed to kill them all.
My solution is to not kill them, and when they leave your womb you can put them up for adoption if you don't want to raise them. Your solution is to kill them, thus "controlling" their very life.
i just dont care. why are you so obsessed with it?
Okay, that's the answer I was looking for. You just don't care. And that explains your "obsession" with abortion, and coming here to support it.
No, just the ones who decide to kill several of their unborn in a row.....
Thank you. Coming from someone who "just doesn't care", that's a wonderful compliment!

reply from: nancyu

Considering my high level of intelligence it's not hard to outdo me in stupidity. In fact, most of the nation is stupider than I am.

reply from: nancyu

It's one thing to have treatment for women for special conditions such as you describe. It is an entirely different matter to be advertising this pill on National television for use by ALL WOMEN to avoid NORMAL periods!

reply from: Cecilia

It's one thing to have treatment for women for special conditions such as you describe. It is an entirely different matter to be advertising this pill on National television for use by ALL WOMEN to avoid NORMAL periods!
why do you think so?
for me, i might think it was wrong because sufficenct studying has not been done on the medication to determine long term affects. but i say that about any medication that is 'newbie'.
otherwise i don't care what people do with their periods of all things.

reply from: Yuuki

It's one thing to have treatment for women for special conditions such as you describe. It is an entirely different matter to be advertising this pill on National television for use by ALL WOMEN to avoid NORMAL periods!
ANY; not ALL. To say ALL implies Big Brother is going to force every woman to take pills. ANY means ANY woman who WANTS to.

reply from: scopia19822

If a woman does not want to have a period for whatever reasons that it is her buiness if she takes the Pill to suppress them as long as she knows the potential risk and consequnces of doing such a thing.

reply from: Cecilia

If a woman does not want to have a period for whatever reasons that it is her buiness if she takes the Pill to suppress them as long as she knows the potential risk and consequnces of doing such a thing.
that is exactly what I would hope one would think about abortion.

reply from: yoda

Well, THIS "one" doesn't think that way at all.
I consider that the moral equivalent of saying "I would hope that one would think that about killing their born kids too".


2017 ~ LifeDiscussions.org ~ Discussions on Life, Abortion, and the Surrounding Politics