Home - List All Discussions

Mind your own business, I'm pro-choice

by: monicac21

I seriously don't understand how it's anyones right to tell people that they can't make thier own decisions in life ! All these people who go around pretesting abortion all need to mind thier own business. The woman who decides to have an abortion, has nothing to do with them or her decision won't effect anyone elses life. So if anyone can come up with a good reason as to why pro-life believers have the right to put their noses into anyone elses business, I would be happy to hear it. I highly doubt anyone can. It really piss me off that all these people are so into everyone elses life and not thier own. Maybe someone should start protesting against something these pro-life believers do everyday, and totally cause an interuption thier life, see how they feel about it. Now about this whole KKK thing I see around this site, everybody knows that those followers are crazy and have no idea what thier talking about so why listen to them? Another thing I don't understand is how someone can believe that there should only be one type of race on this earth. Come on that is the stupidest thing that I have ever heard. Seriously I see all the Pro-Life believers and the KKK and I laugh at how someone can be that stupid. I'm hoping that someone can explain this to me so that I understand. Again I highly doubt anyone will.

reply from: cali1981

That is not true; it affects the child's life. That is why we oppose it.
Absolutely nothing gives pro-lifers the "right" to put their noses into others' business. No such right exists. How do you define "putting one's nose into another's business"? Please explain yourself more clearly.

reply from: ThunderKitten

It is simply concern for the welfare of other human beings. Some oppose abortion because of the damage it causes to the woman. Some oppose it because of the damage it causes to the baby. Some oppose it for the damage it causes others, perhaps the father. Some oppose it for all of these reasons, maybe more.
"Pro-lifers" generally don't protest for the fun of it. Sure, people argue for the sake of arguing sometimes, but protesting means getting off your butt and standing around for hours. If a person didn't really care about what they were protesting for, they'd find something better to do, or just stay home. If you want to protest for the sake of irritating pro-lifers, be my guest, but I think you'll get bored fast.
I can't respond to what others are saying about the KKK thing. True or not, it wouldn't make a difference to me. Abortion is the same horror, the same killing of the innocents either way.
About your topic title: Did America stop the genocide in Rwanda? No, we mostly minded our own business. Did the genocide end anyway? Eventually, but people were raped and killed while we "minded our own business." Minding one's own business when terrible things are happening doesn't respect privacy or anything else. It only lets others get hurt.
Sometimes, others have said, it seems that the pro-life cause is filled with contempt and hatred. At times that may be true, but it is because of the agony that is felt for or by those who are harmed by abortion, and rage that some would justify it, commit it, even claim it to be a "right." It brings anger, frustration, pain... because it continues every day with no end in sight. Abortion does hurt us, even those of us who will never experience it for ourselves, because we feel empathy. We care.
Do we always hurt when someone else hurts or dies? No. We could never survive if we did. But when we let ourselves feel, and sometimes when we don't want to, it gets us, it wounds us. At times all we can do is push the suffering to the back of our minds, and think intellectually, so we can work towards helping others. So we can live our lives.
When I was pregnant with my child, I saw a tabloid headline about a star's miscarriage. It filled me with saddness for that poor woman, and it filled me with outrage. How DARE they exploit this woman's misery, trash her privacy, to sell papers and provide people with gossip? When I was pregnant, I could not even read about abortion without tears welling up in my eyes. It gave me pain, it upset me. I had a child in my womb and reading about others being killed upset me.

reply from: xnavy

during world war ii people used to watch the trains with people go down the tracks and they minded their own business, millions of
people died. when you see people suffering or dying and don't do anything, what is the saying, evil flourishes when good men
do nothing.

reply from: yoda

Is it anyone else's business when a woman kills her born child? If so, then morally why isn't it someone else's business when she kills her unborn child?
They have a satirical webpage which pokes fun at Planned Parenthood by calling them "Klanned Parenthood", but often times those of lower intelligence mistakenly think that webpage is an endorsement of the real KKK. I'm sure you're too intelligent to think that, aren't you?

reply from: Alexandra

As John Donne said, "No man is an island."
What you do (or don't do) affects EVERYONE.
Consider that since the Roe ruling, child abuse rates have skyrocketed. So yeah, it's everyone's business!
Since abortion was "legalized" our birth rate has dropped and we're staring at negative population growth. That's everyone's business too.

reply from: xnavy

by the way i took my daughter to the emergency room because she couldn't keep anything down, i had to sign a release form
before they would treat her. they gave her pheneragan.the point i was trying to make
was, what gives pp the right to do sugery on my daughter and but the emergency room
won't touch my daughter for nausea w/o my permission.pp is planned parenthood or
any other abortion clinic.

reply from: theamericancatholic

Its called free speech.
Causing the deaths of innocent unborn child IS our business.
Its called the common welfare.
The pro-life people are not the ones killing innocent unborn children every day.

reply from: Alexandra

Personally, I don't care if you have an abortion so long as the baby isn't harmed or killed.

reply from: MaleNurse

You mean one you don't like the egocentric view that one race has over another? Take it a little further:
The egocentric view that one age-group (the born) has over another (the unborn)
Yes I agree with you
Did Yoda help you Tom?

reply from: Tam

Right on Alexandra. I feel the same way. That's why I say I'm "anti-babykilling" because really it's that which I oppose.

reply from: bradensmommy

Is it just me or are these new anti-lifers getting more lame with thier logic and "reasoning"?
I'm getting sleepy just reading thier posts....

reply from: Alexandra

Right on Alexandra. I feel the same way. That's why I say I'm "anti-babykilling" because really it's that which I oppose.
In a sense my pregnancy was terminated when I had a C-section. It was more to help my baby out because he just wasn't coming out. Guess it wasn't HIS idea (has to be his idea...he's always been like that).
I also have to laugh at "needing" a third-trimester abortion for health (or life) of the mother. C-section. Baby can survive. The death of the child isn't necessary.
Of course they don't call it a pregnancy termination...more like "taking" the baby.

reply from: yoda

No, it's not just you...... the more they come the lamer they get..... for some reason.

reply from: prolifejedi

I don't think a thirteen year old is mature enough to make healthy decisions about sex, yet we have teens this young experimenting with oral sex. Why? Cause PP told them to (not directly, but indirectly with their graphic sex ed material).
If I ever have children, they will be taught to save themselves for marriage. They also will have self control, self esteem and self respect. Things PP doesn't seem to want kids to have..............and PP claims they want to reduce abortions, but yet they keep doing the surgery every day.
They also cover up for statutory rapists.
So, I think as a concerned citizen, I have a right to want to protect a little innocent life.

reply from: xnavy

i heard something cute on the radio today, they said on 96.9 radio station in roanoke va, a customer gave a 1000.00 to a prenant
19 year waitress and told her to keep the change and good luck with the baby. they said she quite a tummy. i am sure the proaborts
would have suggested abortion.

reply from: Alexandra

And they say pro-lifers don't help out.
Good on that customer!
I wish I had that kind of money to help out. I am pretty good at crocheting, though....

reply from: tabithamarcotte

So, Monica, would you invade a rapist's business? I mean, you can't invade HIS right to privacy...

reply from: blessedami

Hello i am Christian so i am Pro Life but do i go around protesting Hell no..i am a Christian which i am taught and i belive in NOT judging anyone for you only answer to GOD...
i had an abortion about 6 or 7 years ago i was not ready for a baby i have a 8 yr old daughter she was like 1 back then and do i with that i had not some times i feel bad others i do not because i know that my Lord and Savior Jesus has forgiven me as i forgive all others.
You are right who in the Hell are these Klan people who claim to be Pro LIFE they are all a bunch of confused People who i will be Praying for cause what they are sayign goes against beign Pro Life
Well God Bless you and it is nice to see someoen else has some sense on thsi site
Nik

reply from: bradensmommy

Please, if you are going to come on this board talking like a victimized black woman who is hated by whitie I'm not even going to bother with you. Your words are enough to make me seem that I'm reading BS from Kanye West.

reply from: SarahEWHaag

I am a pro-lifer and I don't believe I have the right to tell you how to run your life. However, you said that "The woman who decides to have an abortion, has nothing to do with them or her decision won't effect anyone elses life." You are wrong. The decision does effect someone else's life. The baby's life. If that isn't SOMEONE, than you need to look at the science of an unborn baby and tell me that it isn't a human being.

reply from: SarahEWHaag

Another thing, what makes you think that Pro-lifers believe that there should only be one race on the earth? I am pro-life and I definitely don't believe that. To believe that is unbiblical.

reply from: AshMarie88

The baby's life and potentially the father's/family's life all in one. It's pretty sad people still say it doesn't affect anyone...

reply from: Alexandra

Who sent you--Al Sharpton?

reply from: yoda

I give Al more credit than that....... he can spell better, too.
And it doesn't matter how many times I post a definition, the probabykilling trolls will always ignore them.

reply from: Alexandra

I can't see how people like Al Sharpton get to be called "Reverend." The dude is a probabykiller and he and Jesse Jackson are huge instigators.
I could insert something about how Native Americans got the shaft, since I'm part Cherokee, but I won't.

reply from: yoda

ANYONE can be called "Reverend", there are no requirements for that title.

reply from: Alexandra

Just strut around and wave a Bible and act like you're all that.
Ever notice that Jesse Jackson never met a camera he didn't like?
Heheh...guess we're getting off track here....

reply from: blessedami

I never once said that i was victimized Read what i said !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And no one and i mena no can JUDGE ME OR YOU only GOD can judge us so re read what i said and then respond and wow Kanye really got to you huh? Truth Hurts??????
Blessings

reply from: blessedami

mind if i ask where is all this Al Sharpton adn Jesse Jackson bashing coming from>
I thought Pro Life was PRO meaning for Life which mean LOVE
am i worng in that? because i merely found this site my ppure accident and i had to ask are you all Klan? if you are not then say no and that is that
Jesse adn Al have nothing to do with this are you not your own amn or woman?

reply from: Alexandra

If you think all pro-lifers are KKK you're just as guilty of prejudice as someone who doesn't like black people just because they're black.
I'm part Native American myself and that people has gotten a worse deal than the blacks!
It's just that a lot of us resent being referred to as KKK just for being pro-life.
I'm very conservative but I don't have a problem with black people in general. We're not all Archie Bunker here.

reply from: SarahEWHaag

Apparently there aren't requirements anymore. You can get ordained on the internet. That's terrible.

reply from: bradensmommy

Kanye West is full of BS straight up...he never "got" to me....I don't do well with liars and morons and you are up there with him. You may have never said you were a victim but you sure as hell talk like you are...

reply from: Scarlet

I seriously don't understand how people can say it doesn't effect anyone elses life, considering that what we are talking about is a baby, not a belly button piercing. I dont see people prostesting that, or tattoos...
Those are things, a baby is a baby. Its not a blob of tissue, check up on the growth of a baby in the womb and see where the blob of tissue is? Partial birth abortion, again, blob of tissue? Can you really say that this isnt a baby, a person, a life? I seriously doubt you can.
The reason people can be for this is because they don't have the facts. They easily fall for pretty wording like "procedure" and "choice" when really those words mean murder by tearing a baby apart or burning skin with saline as it convulses in pain and choice as in using violence to get what you want.
Get the other side of the story before you can comfortably say that abortion is fine and nothing wrong with it. If you checked what it really is you couldnt say there is nothing wrong with it. EVER!

reply from: yoda

Try using a dictionary sometimes, it's interesting:
pro-life adjective against open access to abortion: in favor of bringing the human fetus to full term, especially by campaigning against open access to abortion and against experimentation on embryos http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=1861736610

reply from: yoda

Welcome to the forum, Scarlet. You're 100% right, BTW.

reply from: nsanford

Off the main point of your post, I am well imformed and am still believe in a woman's right to an abortion. Incorrect, sorry.

reply from: yoda

Then that makes you a "well-informed probabykilling advocate". I could more easily excuse your prediliction for killing babies if you were confused and mistaken.

reply from: AshMarie88

Off the main point of your post, I am well imformed and am still believe in a woman's right to an abortion. Incorrect, sorry.
Go watch Harder Truth (or Choice Blues) and then tell me that women should have the right to do that to a defenseless little human being.

reply from: nsanford

Then that makes you a "well-informed probabykilling advocate". I could more easily excuse your prediliction for killing babies if you were confused and mistaken.
Why do I even bother responding to you? You just seem to call me or Sigma a babykiller, we get mad, etc. etc. In other words, you just aggravate the debates.
But still...
Hmmm...
Confused and mistaken?
I could say the same of you or any other pro-lifer.
It goes both ways, Yoda.

reply from: nsanford

Ash(what's with me and nicknames today?)
I have watched abortion video's a number of times. I know the procedure.
You automatically assume I've never seen an abortion?

reply from: yoda

You just don't get it, do you? If you were confused and mistaken, you could be forgiven your involvement in the slaughter of 47 million babies in this country.
Since you say you are "well-informed", that means you are fully responsible for your part of that massive slaughter of innocent human life.

reply from: nsanford

Ahhh...
So my opinions are unforgivable?
You make me laugh, Yoda.
ha ha ha.
"Unforgivable"
I needed that.

reply from: AshMarie88

Then you should know what happens to the baby (which you do).
But you still argue in favor of doing that to those humans.
Why? What makes abortion so important that women should have the right to do that to their kids? What makes abortion so right?

reply from: yoda

I'm agnostic, remember? And I associate with women who have aborted, and now regret it. Many of them are on our side now, helping us to stop the madness. So "forgiveness" is not an issue with me, you'll have to take that us with someone else. Besides, holding an opinion and expressing it in public are two very different things.
But don't let me interrupt your laughing, you probably do need it.

reply from: nsanford

I'm serious now, I'm going to ignore Yoda. He makes no real point. It was funny at first, then it got sad, then annoying, and now it's just plain boring.
But anyway, I don't think abortion is "right". But I do think women have the right to abortion if they want one.

reply from: yoda

We know it's legal, ns. Has been since '73, right?
Who else do you think has the right to kill innocent human beings? Cops? Gang members? Jilted lovers? Who else has the "right" to kill the innocent, ns?
So abortion "isn't right", and yet it's "right" for women to do it? Bucke up, ns, your not making much sense.

reply from: nsanford

Do I hear a bird chirping?

reply from: AshMarie88

Then you should take that stand with rape and murder as well. They too are choices that harm someone else. Why should they be exceptions?
AGAIN, what makes abortion SO IMPORTANT that women should be able to have them?

reply from: yoda

No, that was ns pretending to be ignoring another poster. Like we even cared.........

reply from: nsanford

Then you should take that stand with rape and murder as well. They too are choices that harm someone else. Why should they be exceptions?
AGAIN, what makes abortion SO IMPORTANT that women should be able to have them?
This forum is like a circle, we keep coming back to the same points.
Murder and rape do not fall under a woman making a choice with her own body.

reply from: yoda

It's the VICTIMS we are concerned with ns, NOT the PERPETRATORS.
Are you a criminal attorney or something? Do you rush to the defense of all killers of innocent people?

reply from: nsanford

I'm serious, I think I'm crazy.
I still hear the bird.

reply from: yoda

You'll get no argument from me about the crazy part.

reply from: AshMarie88

Then you should take that stand with rape and murder as well. They too are choices that harm someone else. Why should they be exceptions?
AGAIN, what makes abortion SO IMPORTANT that women should be able to have them?
This forum is like a circle, we keep coming back to the same points.
Murder and rape do not fall under a woman making a choice with her own body.
Neither does abortion.
When an act hurts someone else, the person that's doing it isn't doing it to their own body.

reply from: nsanford

I should just start copying and pasting my answers. You ask the same questions over and over.
*sigh*
Abortion does indeed harm another person. But the woman is still asserting control over her body.
I don't know how Sigma does it...

reply from: yoda

So does murder. What fine company you keep.

reply from: AshMarie88

No, the woman is asserting control over the other body she is having brutally killed.
If it was really only her body she was controlling, she would be the only one, if she chose to, dead.

reply from: nsanford

No, the woman is asserting control over the other body she is having brutally killed.
If it was really only her body she was controlling, she would be the only one, if she chose to, dead.
Why is he still bothering to answer? Does he think he will get me angry enough to respond?
Anyway, a woman is removing the fetus from her body, and it was dependant on her. If anybody no longer wishes to give anyone or anything care, they should have the right to end it.
You do get it now, right?
Please say I won't have to type this anymore.

reply from: AshMarie88

No, the woman is asserting control over the other body she is having brutally killed.
If it was really only her body she was controlling, she would be the only one, if she chose to, dead.
Why is he still bothering to answer? Does he think he will get me angry enough to respond?
Anyway, a woman is removing the fetus from her body, and it was dependant on her. If anybody no longer wishes to give anyone or anything care, they should have the right to end it.
You do get it now, right?
Please say I won't have to type this anymore.
A CHILD IS DEPENDANT ON A PERSON TOO!
Why does it matter if the preborn are dependant? Why does that make them less entitled to life? Selfish much?
My cousin's one year old is completely depednant on me when I care for him. That does not mean I have the right to kill him because of that. Same goes for other people.

reply from: nsanford

Looks like I'm going to be able to practice my typing.
Dependant on her body . As in biologically.
For goodness sakes...

reply from: AshMarie88

Dependant on HER body. But the child that's dependant on her is NOT her body.
Get it?

reply from: nsanford

No. And I realize now neither will you.
Goodbye, I can only go around and around for so long.

reply from: yoda

Because you are still posting your probabykilling crap on this forum, and I have just as much right to post here as you do.
Not when it costs someone their life. If someone is stuck in your home during a blizzard (God forbid!), you have NO RIGHT to throw them out in it, knowing it will kill them!
You just like to see people die, don't you?

reply from: nsanford

You know what?
I give, Yoda. You are being such an annoying little...
No, no, I'm calm. I'll respond like it's any other poster.
Now this certain poster said:
If they were using all my firewood and eating all my food, then, yes I would throw them out. Bad analogy.
What a wonderful contribution, Yoda. Are you proud?
That was a real point!

reply from: yoda

The hypothetical ASSUMED that you had plenty of everything you needed, and that your life was in no danger.
But YOU would still throw them out, right?

reply from: nsanford

The hypothetical ASSUMED that you had plenty of everything you needed, and that your life was in no danger.
But YOU would still throw them out, right?
Yes, Yes! I love murder! It's great! Controls overpopulation! Keep it up!
Just so you know, that was sarcasm, so don't go creating a thread about me like you did with Sigma.

reply from: yoda

Wouldn't dream of it. So, in all seriousness, do you see how aborting a baby is like throwing a guest out of a safe home into a blizzzrd?

reply from: nsanford

No.
Is that why we disagree so much?

reply from: yoda

Apparently so. A baby IS a guest, and throwing it out of the womb IS an action that will usually kill it..........
So why don't you see the comparison?

reply from: nsanford

Because, a house is not a body, and throwing someone out of my house is not comparable to abortion.

reply from: yoda

That's the best you can do? Doesn't it matter to you that BOTH the victims are innocent, and yet BOTH are put to death?
You know, if you look hard enough, you can find differences in EVERY comparison. But if you open your eyes, you can also see the similarities in them.
Apparently you are closing your eyes.

reply from: AshMarie88

Actually it is quite comparable to abortion.
There is a snow storm (pretend it's a pregnancy).
And let's just say a person is living in your house (to a woman, a womb) for a short period of time (comparable to pregnancy) until that storm is over.
If you throw them out now (aborting) they might die, since there would be no protection (just follow...) and the snow storm (pregnancy) wasn't over. Now, they die because you kicked them out (to a woman, having an abortion) so soon. They weren't ready to be outside of your house.
On the other hand... You could let them live in your house til the storm was over, then you could let them go and you wouldn't have to see them again unless you didn't want to (in the same way, adoption), or you could keep them at your house and let them live there (in the other way, parenting).

reply from: yoda

Interesting, isn't it AshMarie? If you look, you can find all kinds of similarities between to two different situation, can't you? But if you close your eyes, cover your ears, and say "Nya nya nya nya, I'm not looking or listening"....... they seem totally different!

reply from: cali1981

Right on Alexandra. I feel the same way. That's why I say I'm "anti-babykilling" because really it's that which I oppose.
Yes, right on! I should really start referring to myself as anti-babykilling. It clears a lot of things up.

reply from: cali1981

A wonderful summary of the similarities that can be found in these two situations.
NO ONE has ANY right to cut off the rest of someone else's life by refusing them the most basic and universal requirements for living if they have those things to give.

reply from: Tam

A wonderful summary of the similarities that can be found in these two situations.
NO ONE has ANY right to cut off the rest of someone else's life by refusing them the most basic and universal requirements for living if they have those things to give.
Yeah! Great analogy, Ash!

reply from: Sigma

Really. What leads you to believe this is so of every situation?

reply from: cali1981

Because I believe that all human beings are equal. Every innocent person has an equal right to live, and that should be upheld regardless of race, gender, religion, age, sexual orientation, level of development, degree of dependency, or location. Life is the most important right we enjoy. If we are deprived of our lives, we are deprived of everything. Keeping the necessities of life from someone makes you responsible for their death.

reply from: yoda

I refer to that as "egalatarianism", cali. I use it to illustrate that since we are all "equals", or IOW on the same "moral level", none of us has any right to claim any moral authority over another, and most definately NOT any right to take another innocent life. Only a being that is morally superior, (like a supernatural diety) has such a moral right, IMO.

reply from: cali1981

Great point. I didn't think of it so much as a "moral level," but you're right - in that it's no less bad to take a certain person's life over another's.

reply from: Sigma

I did not ask you your beliefs on a personal level. Perhaps I should be more specific: What leads you to believe this is legally so in every situation? Would it be illegal to deny shelter to someone in a storm, even were they to die without it?

reply from: yoda

Some of us like to consider moral situations in a moral light, Siggy, rather than dwell on legal technicalities. Try to respond to such moral reasonings with feelings from your heart, rather than recite law to us, okay? Can you do that?

reply from: cali1981

We're not talking about whether it's "legally so." We're talking about moral reasoning, as Yoda said. A premise of pro-lifers is that abortion shouldn't be legal, so there can certainly be other things that are legal that shouldn't be, and it would make no sense to refer to those things in making an argument.

reply from: Rights

What you fail to understand is simply that the debate resolves around a single issue, when is a human being a human being ? To you a fetus is a mere collection of tissues. So destroying it "affects no one else".
To Pro-Lifers, an infant is human regardless of the fact that is needs the womb for early growth. I know the argument. It goes, "The fetus is part of the mother. And the proof lies in the fact that if the mother dies, the fetus dies."
But, after the birth, the child still needs the mother. If a mother dies after the birth and she is not near others who can give the child what it needs, the child dies too. So does that mean that the child is still part of the mother, and that it is the right of the mother to destroy the child all the way to the age that the child can survive on its own? The human child might not be able to find its own food for many years. Does that mean it is not yet human; and therefore not entitled to protection under the law?
You speak with derision of those who see the members of other races as "sub-human" and, therefore not deserving of the normal human considerations, such as the right to live. Do you not see your own bias? The only difference between you and the KKKers is that their bias is race related while yours is age related. To them anyone who is not white is not human. To you anyone under the age of nine months is not human. For that is the real age of a human at birth.
I don't expect you to change your mind. Your dichotomy of anger at both those who revere life unconditionally and at those who don't is the hallmark of a closed mind.

reply from: yoda

Welcome to the forum, rights. Would it be correct to assume that your post is addressed to the author of the first post?

reply from: Sigma

Ah, I see. I assumed you were talking about more than your personal beliefs when you were saying "NO ONE has ANY right to[...]" and "[...]has an equal right to live[...]"
If this is not the case then my objection would not apply.

reply from: Sigma

Rights, who is your post directed to?

reply from: GodsLaw2Live

Everything we do in life has consequences. Our actions always impact others. We are not in a vacuum. Our actions must be harmonious. What other people do is our business, for it affects us all.

reply from: Sigma

So everything everyone does is everyone's business?

reply from: tabithamarcotte

When it comes to killing, it is someone else's business.

reply from: nsanford

So you believe you have the right to contol other's bodies, because it might affect you.

reply from: AshMarie88

So you believe you have the right to contol other's bodies, because it might affect you.
That's not what she is saying. She didn't say anything about someone else's body or how it affects us. She says when it come to KILLING, it's not just anyone's business.

reply from: tabithamarcotte

If it is immoral, then yes. If a friend of mine was doing illegal drugs, I would do everything in my power to stop him/her, because his/her actions was affecting people badly, and hurting her/himself, also. Abortion also does that.

reply from: nsanford

Everything in your power? So would you kidnap them and force them to go to rehab? Convince all you want, but some times people need to mind their own business.

reply from: AshMarie88

Oh great idea. Hey, take your own advice. If you ever see a mother in the street, beating her child, don't get help. Just mind your own business and keep on walking.
Same with if a man rapes a woman. Mind your own business, not his.

reply from: tabithamarcotte

PRIVACY. PRIVACY. PRIVACY.
We're being brainwashed with privacy!!!
In the great words of Michael Palin, "Help! I'm being oppressed!"
Because it is absolutely HORRIBLE and DISGUSTING to save someone from hurt, despair, physical injuries, etc.
What Ashley said, dude, we should all respect everyone's "right to privacy" to the extent of not bothering to help a woman being raped or a child being beaten by his/her parent!
That'll show those anti-righters!!!!!
P.S. It is not within my capability to kidnap someone, so that's out of the question.

reply from: Tam

Great post, welcome to the forum!


2017 ~ LifeDiscussions.org ~ Discussions on Life, Abortion, and the Surrounding Politics